• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

StrictlyVC, LLC

Six months ahead.

  • Home
  • Newsletter
  • Advertising
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • About
    • About Connie
    • Mission
    • Code of Ethics
  • Contact

An IPO Survey Hints at Trouble

nowhere to runThis morning, the law firm Fenwick & West published its most recent report on the state of the IPO market. Its “2014 IPO Survey” doesn’t hold many surprises, but it does underscore an important point: Public market investors have grown more discriminating than they were in the late ’90s — and that’s bad news for the many late-stage companies that are being assigned bubble-era valuations.

Let’s start with the number of IPOs in the U.S. across all industries last year. Sixty-eight life sciences companies went public (up from 41 in 2013). Meanwhile, 38 U.S.-based tech companies went public, which is almost exactly how many went public in 2013 when 37 IPO’d. (For some context, in 1999, 308 U.S. tech companies went public.)

Life sciences offerings were on average smaller than technology deals, reports Fenwick, and they faced more pricing uncertainty. Of the life sciences deals in the first half and second half of 2014, approximately 44 percent and 52 percent priced below the bottom end of their expected range, compared with 15 percent and 27 percent of tech deals.

Then again, they went public much faster, says Fenwick, which reports that of the tech companies that priced in the second half of last year, roughly two-thirds were on file for more than five months before pricing.

Either way, the trend, post offering, was downward. According to Fenwick, those tech companies to go public in the first half of last year saw their shares fall by an average of 16.2 percent by the time their lock-up periods had expired. On average, shares of life sciences companies to go public in the first half of last year were down 1.3 percent by the end of their lock-up periods.

Castlight Health, the cloud-based health-care tech company whose shares soared 149 percent on its opening day roughly a year ago, probably factors meaningfully into the above figures. Almost immediately after its IPO, its stock began to spiral. Today, those shares, originally priced at $16, are trading at $9.

Still, the second half of the year looked much the same. In fact, first-day pricing appears to have grown even more rational, with tech stocks falling an average of 3 percent by the time their lock-up periods had ended, and life sciences shares dropping by 1.5 percent.

That lack of drama is good for the public market investors, who are plainly approaching new offerings more carefully than they did during the go-go days of the late ’90s Internet boom and bust.

It’s bad news for the many still-private tech companies have been raising money at exuberant valuations. (They can’t all be the next Uber.)

You can download Fenwick’s full report here.

Related articles

  • Slump in Initial Public Offerings Bodes Poorly for U.S. Employment, Economic Growth, According to Kauffman Report

Filed Under: IPOs Tagged With: Fenwick & West, IPOs

Don’t Miss Out! 

Sign up today to receive a free daily email with everything you need to start your day. Plus, keep track of the companies and personalities that will shape the industry in the months and years to come. Let StrictlyVC be your very own venture capital concierge.

Sign Up →

 

Primary Sidebar

Sign Up!

Add your email below to receive a copy of our free daily StrictlyVC newsletter. (Please don't forget to confirm your email address by clicking on the link in the confirmation link we will send you!)

You can unsubscribe anytime. For more details, please review our Privacy Policy.

Thank you!

We have sent you an email. Please click on the link to confirm your subscription!

.

@StrictlyVC on Twitter

Tweets by StrictlyVC
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Advertising

StrictlyVC, LLC

© 2023 StrictlyVC, LLC. All rights reserved.